linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] nested sleeps, fixes and debug infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140925091556.GB5430@worktop>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:15:56 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, ilya.dryomov@...tank.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] nested sleeps, fixes and debug infrastructure

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:06:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:30:03AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 10:18 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This is a refresh of the nested sleep debug stuff which I posted as an RFC a
> > > while back: lkml.kernel.org/r/20140804103025.478913141@...radead.org
> > > 
> > > Since then a number of issues identified by these patches have allready made
> > > their way upstream:
> > > 
> > >     de713b57947a ("atm/svc: Fix blocking in wait loop")
> > >     7c3af9752573 ("nfs: don't sleep with inode lock in lock_and_join_requests")
> > > 
> > > And I finally got some time to finish up these patches so we could merge them.
> > > So please have a look and if nobody holllers we'll merge this 'soon'.
> > 
> > My DL980 hollered itself to death while booting.
> > 
> > [   39.587224] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<ffffffff811021d0>] kauditd_thread+0x130/0x1e0
> > [   39.706325] Modules linked in: iTCO_wdt(E) gpio_ich(E) iTCO_vendor_support(E) joydev(E) i7core_edac(E) lpc_ich(E) hid_generic(E) hpwdt(E) mfd_core(E) edac_core(E) bnx2(E) shpchp(E) sr_mod(E) ehci_pci(E) hpilo(E) netxen_nic(E) ipmi_si(E) cdrom(E) pcspkr(E) sg(E) acpi_power_meter(E) ipmi_msghandler(E) button(E) ext4(E) jbd2(E) mbcache(E) crc16(E) usbhid(E) radeon(E) ttm(E) drm_kms_helper(E) drm(E) i2c_algo_bit(E) uhci_hcd(E) ehci_hcd(E) usbcore(E) sd_mod(E) thermal(E) usb_common(E) processor(E) scsi_dh_hp_sw(E) scsi_dh_emc(E) scsi_dh_rdac(E) scsi_dh_alua(E) scsi_dh(E) ata_generic(E) ata_piix(E) libata(E) hpsa(E) cciss(E) scsi_mod(E)
> > [   40.373599] CPU: 9 PID: 1974 Comm: kauditd Tainted: G            E  3.17.0-default #2
> > [   40.506928] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard ProLiant DL980 G7, BIOS P66 07/07/2010
> > [   40.613753]  0000000000001bd9 ffff88026f3d3d78 ffffffff815b2fc2 ffff88026f3d3db8
> > [   40.728720]  ffffffff8106613c ffff88026f3d3da8 ffff88026b4fa110 0000000000000000
> > [   40.816116]  0000000000000038 ffffffff8180ff47 ffff88026f3d3e58 ffff88026f3d3e18
> > [   40.905088] Call Trace:
> > [   40.938325]  [<ffffffff815b2fc2>] dump_stack+0x72/0x88
> > [   41.000143]  [<ffffffff8106613c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
> > [   41.067996]  [<ffffffff81066226>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> > [   41.132669]  [<ffffffff811021d0>] ? kauditd_thread+0x130/0x1e0
> > [   41.204105]  [<ffffffff811021d0>] ? kauditd_thread+0x130/0x1e0
> > [   41.270699]  [<ffffffff8108d214>] __might_sleep+0x84/0xa0
> > [   41.333979]  [<ffffffff8110224b>] kauditd_thread+0x1ab/0x1e0
> > [   41.398612]  [<ffffffff810940c0>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x210/0x210
> > [   41.465435]  [<ffffffff811020a0>] ? audit_printk_skb+0x70/0x70
> > [   41.534628]  [<ffffffff810859db>] kthread+0xeb/0x100
> > [   41.596562]  [<ffffffff810858f0>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x80/0x80
> > [   41.678973]  [<ffffffff815b85bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> > [   41.742073]  [<ffffffff810858f0>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x80/0x80
> 
> Cute,.. where exactly is that __might_sleep coming from; nothing obvious
> there (then again, I'm half asleep) and stuff seems to have gotten
> inlined.

D'uh asleep indeed. Its the try_to_freeze() call. Curious construct
there, they don't actually have a wait loop, just a single go round.

I suppose just flipping the scheudle() and try_to_freeze() should do the
trick. Ugly code that, but then again, I think audit is known for that.

Can you give that a go?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/