[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140925103337.GH20043@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:33:37 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"chris@...kel.net" <chris@...kel.net>,
"cmetcalf@...era.com" <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"jcmvbkbc@...il.com" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
"jesper.nilsson@...s.com" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"sam@...nborg.org" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"starvik@...s.com" <starvik@...s.com>,
"takata@...ux-m32r.org" <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...aro.org" <broonie@...aro.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] m68k: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor
macros for writes
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:51:10AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> >> Putting them here means they won't have any multiple include protection
> >> (there is no "#ifndef _IO_H" around them). Doesn't seem to lead to
> >> any problems in practice. Just flagging it...
> >
> > That's easy enough to fix, and actually, we should have __KERNEL__ checks
> > here too. Fixup below.
>
> Why do we need __KERNEL__ checks? <asm/io.h> is not exported.
> BTW, it seems there are many __KERNEL__ checks in arch/*/include/asm/
> we don't need.
>
> Or do I need more coffee?
No, I think you're quite right. I just saw the __KERNEL__ checks in io_no.h
and io_mm.h -- the latter even has some code outside of the guards:
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#define __ARCH_HAS_NO_PAGE_ZERO_MAPPED 1
/*
* Convert a physical pointer to a virtual kernel pointer for /dev/mem
* access
*/
#define xlate_dev_mem_ptr(p) __va(p)
/*
* Convert a virtual cached pointer to an uncached pointer
*/
#define xlate_dev_kmem_ptr(p) p
#define ioport_map(port, nr) ((void __iomem *)(port))
#endif /* _IO_H */
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists