linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2] mm: memcontrol: do not iterate uninitialized memcgs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140925114339.GD12090@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:43:39 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm: memcontrol: do not iterate uninitialized memcgs

On Wed 24-09-14 22:40:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Argh, buggy css_put() against the root.  Hand grenades, everywhere.
> Update:
> 
> ---
> From 9b0b4d72d71cd8acd7aaa58d2006c751decc8739 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:00:20 -0400
> Subject: [patch] mm: memcontrol: do not iterate uninitialized memcgs
> 
> The cgroup iterators yield css objects that have not yet gone through
> css_online(), but they are not complete memcgs at this point and so
> the memcg iterators should not return them.  d8ad30559715 ("mm/memcg:
> iteration skip memcgs not yet fully initialized") set out to implement
> exactly this, but it uses CSS_ONLINE, a cgroup-internal flag that does
> not meet the ordering requirements for memcg, and so we still may see
> partially initialized memcgs from the iterators.

I do not see how would this happen. CSS_ONLINE is set after css_online
callback returns and mem_cgroup_css_online ends the core initialization
with mutex_unlock which should provide sufficient memory ordering
requirements (kmem is not covered but activate_kmem_mutex kmem.tcp by
proto_list_mutex). So the worst thing that might happen is that we miss
an already initialized memcg but that shouldn't matter because such a
memcg doesn't contain any tasks nor memory. memcg_has_children doesn't
rely on our iterators so important parts will not miss anything.

So I do not see any bug right now. The flag abuse is another story and I
do agree we should use proper memcg specific synchronization here as
explained by Tejun in other email.

> The cgroup core can not reasonably provide a clear answer on whether
> the object around the css has been fully initialized, as that depends
> on controller-specific locking and lifetime rules.  Thus, introduce a
> memcg-specific flag that is set after the memcg has been initialized
> in css_online(), and read before mem_cgroup_iter() callers access the
> memcg members.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

With updated changelog
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>	[3.12+]

This is not necessary IMO

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 306b6470784c..bafdac0f724e 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  	/* vmpressure notifications */
>  	struct vmpressure vmpressure;
>  
> +	/* css_online() has been completed */
> +	bool initialized;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * the counter to account for mem+swap usage.
>  	 */
> @@ -1090,10 +1093,23 @@ skip_node:
>  	 * skipping css reference should be safe.
>  	 */
>  	if (next_css) {
> -		if ((next_css == &root->css) ||
> -		    ((next_css->flags & CSS_ONLINE) &&
> -		     css_tryget_online(next_css)))
> -			return mem_cgroup_from_css(next_css);
> +		struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(next_css);
> +
> +		if (next_css == &root->css)
> +			return memcg;
> +
> +		if (css_tryget_online(next_css)) {
> +			if (memcg->initialized) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Make sure the caller's accesses to
> +				 * the memcg members are issued after
> +				 * we see this flag set.
> +				 */
> +				smp_rmb();
> +				return memcg;
> +			}
> +			css_put(next_css);
> +		}
>  
>  		prev_css = next_css;
>  		goto skip_node;
> @@ -5413,6 +5429,7 @@ mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
>  	struct mem_cgroup *parent = mem_cgroup_from_css(css->parent);
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (css->id > MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX)
>  		return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -5449,7 +5466,16 @@ mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&memcg_create_mutex);
>  
> -	return memcg_init_kmem(memcg, &memory_cgrp_subsys);
> +	ret = memcg_init_kmem(memcg, &memory_cgrp_subsys);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Make sure the initialization is visible before the flag */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +
> +	memcg->initialized = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/