[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409251609500.4604@nanos>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Joe.C" <srv_yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
yingjoe.chen@...il.com, hc.yen@...iatek.com,
eddie.huang@...iatek.com, nathan.chung@...iatek.com,
yh.chen@...iatek.com, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Using hierarchy irqdomian to implement MTK
intpol.
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Joe.C wrote:
> From: "Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
>
> Here's the first draft of using hierarchy irqdomain to implement MTK intpol
> support. I have tested it and intpol works fine. Before continue, I'd like
> to get your comments. This is based on Jiang's hierarchy irqdomian [1] and
> my mediatek SoC basic support [2].
>
> Simplified block diagram for interrupt:
>
> --------- ---------
> ---| CIRQ |------|ARM GIC|
> ---| |------| |
> ---| |------| |
> ---| |------| |
> ---| |------| |
> --------- ---------
>
> In device tree, interrupt-parent for other devices is cirq, child of gic.
> This describe HW better and allow device to specify polarity as it is sent
> by the device. I'm using interrupt-parent to specify irq domain parent in
> cirq now. Maybe adding another name like 'interrupt-domain-parent' will be
> better.
I leave that to the DT folks.
> Currently only set_type is implement in CIRQ, but I think this could extended
> to cover all function gic_arch_extn provided.
Right. Marc, can you have a look at this whether you can see how that
might replace the rest of the arch_extn hackery?
At least the avoidance of the set_type mess looks pretty reasonable.
> In order to use hierarchy irq domain, gic can't use legacy irq domain anymore.
> If arm,hierarchy-irq-domain property is specified, GIC will work in hierarchy
> way and all interrupt must be set by device tree.
>
> One thing worth mention is arg in irq_domain_alloc_irqs. On x86, msi is using
> struct irq_alloc_info, to pass data between irq domain. In irq_create_of_mapping(),
> of_phandle_args is used. All allocs in irq_domain chain will need to use same
> interrupt-cells formats.
Right, but we leave that to the architecture implementation. It needs
to be consistent within an architecture, so we should change the "void
*arg" to a well defined type. For OF architectures this would be
of_phandle_args, other architectures can define their own struct type
which allows to transport data between the domains. That ensures
compile time type checking.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists