lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:28:47 +0200
From:	Oscar Utbult <oscar@...r.io>
To:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Changed "&" with "and" in
 Documentation/applying-patches.txt.

On 2014-09-25 16:48, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:41 PM,  <oscar@...r.io> wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Changed "&" with "and" in 
>> Documentation/applying-patches.txt.
> 
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches says:
> 
> Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
> instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
> to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
> its behaviour.

Thank you for your feedback Frans.

So for example a better description would have been: "use 'and' instead 
of '&'"?

> 
>> From: Oscar Utbult <oscar@...r.io>
>> 
>> http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/3127/when-to-use-instead-of-and
> 
> It might be that a link is enough, but I would prefer to have an
> excerpt from that, possibly with the link as reference.

You are right. I will provide one in the future.

Oscar

> 
> Thanks,
> Frans
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Utbult <oscar@...r.io>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/applying-patches.txt | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/applying-patches.txt 
>> b/Documentation/applying-patches.txt
>> index a083ba3..77df55b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/applying-patches.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/applying-patches.txt
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Common errors when patching
>>  ---
>>   When patch applies a patch file it attempts to verify the sanity of 
>> the
>>  file in different ways.
>> -Checking that the file looks like a valid patch file & checking the 
>> code
>> +Checking that the file looks like a valid patch file and checking the 
>> code
>>  around the bits being modified matches the context provided in the 
>> patch are
>>  just two of the basic sanity checks patch does.
>> 
>> --
>> 1.8.0.1
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
>> linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ