linux-kernel - Re: [media/dvb_usb_af9005] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request (WAS: [media/em28xx] BUG: unable to handle kernel)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54243B6B.9000102@ventoso.org>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:57:31 +0200
From:	Luca Olivetti <luca@...toso.org>
To:	Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@...glemail.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>,
	Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>,
	LKP <lkp@...org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, crope@....fi
Subject: Re: [media/dvb_usb_af9005] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
 (WAS: [media/em28xx] BUG: unable to handle kernel)

El 25/09/14 15:54, Frank Schäfer ha escrit:
> 
> Am 23.09.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Luca Olivetti:
>> El 23/09/14 20:52, Frank Schäfer ha escrit:
>>
>>>>> This seems to be an ancient bug, which is known at least since 5 1/2 years:
>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/4/350
>> [...]
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_MODULE) || defined(CONFIG_DVB_USB_AF9005_REMOTE)
>>> What happens, if CONFIG_MODULES is enabled, but neither module
>>> af9005-remote nor any other IR module is available ?
>>> Has this ever been tested ?
>> I think I tested at the time and symbol_request returned NULL in that
>> case, however I'm not sure and I cannot find any documentation on how
>> symbol_request is supposed to work in that case.
> 
> Ok, thanks.
> I assume noone wants to invest some time into this old driver and covert
> it to todays kernel IR infrastructure as suggested by Antti ? :-)

Not me ;-)

> Then I'm going to send a patch with the 
> 
> #if defined(CONFIG_MODULE) || defined(CONFIG_DVB_USB_AF9005_REMOTE)
> 
> approach.
> That's at least better than leaving the bug unfixed.

Yes, it's an acceptable workaround until the bug in symbol_request is
fixed (because the bug actually is in symbol_request, isn't it?)

Bye
-- 
Luca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/