[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542481B3.8070300@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:57:23 +0200
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.debian@....de>
To: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
CC: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 1/6] fanotify: enable close-on-exec on events' fd when
requested in fanotify_init()
On 24.09.2014 15:11, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> According to commit 80af258867648 ('fanotify: groups can specify
> their f_flags for new fd'), file descriptors created as part of
> file access notification events inherit flags from the
> event_f_flags argument passed to syscall fanotify_init(2).
>
> So while it is legal for userspace to call fanotify_init() with
> O_CLOEXEC as part of its second argument, O_CLOEXEC is currently
> silently ignored.
>
> Indeed event_f_flags are only given to dentry_open(), which only
> seems to care about O_ACCMODE and O_PATH in do_dentry_open(),
> O_DIRECT in open_check_o_direct() and O_LARGEFILE in
> generic_file_open().
I tested on kernel 3.17.0-rc5. I passed O_CLOEXEC in event_f_flags.
When I called fcnt(event_metadata->fd, F_GETFD) it did not return
FD_CLOEXEC. So I can confirm your observation that O_CLOEXEC is not
working as expected.
I found this definition
#define get_unused_fd() get_unused_fd_flags(0)
So essentially when get_unused_fd() is called for a fanotify event
O_CLOEXEC is ignored.
This is what your patch fixes.
>
> More, there's no effective check on event_f_flags value that
> would catch unknown / unsupported values, unlike the one on
> f_flags argument of the syscall (see FAN_ALL_INIT_FLAGS in
> include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h).
The fanotify_init(2) man page describes which flags are allowable in
event_f_flags.
Could you, please, explain why the following code in fanotify_user.c is
not to be considered an effective check:
if (event_f_flags & ~FANOTIFY_INIT_ALL_EVENT_F_BITS)
return -EINVAL;
switch (event_f_flags & O_ACCMODE) {
case O_RDONLY:
case O_RDWR:
case O_WRONLY:
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
I CC Jan Kara as he reviewed the code.
Best regards
Heinrich Schuchardt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists