lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140925211604.GA4590@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:16:04 +0200
From:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To:	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...gle.com>
Cc:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>,
	Paul Cassella <cassella@...y.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: Faults which trigger IO release the mmap_sem

Hi Andres,

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> +	if (!locked) {
> +		VM_BUG_ON(npages != -EBUSY);
> +

Shouldn't this be VM_BUG_ON(npages)?

Alternatively we could patch gup to do:

			case -EHWPOISON:
+			case -EBUSY:
				return i ? i : ret;
-			case -EBUSY:
-				return i;

I need to fix gup_fast slow path to start with FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY
similarly to what you did to the KVM slow path.

gup_fast is called without the mmap_sem (incidentally its whole point
is to only disable irqs and not take the locks) so the enabling of
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY initial pass inside gup_fast should be all self
contained. It shouldn't concern KVM which should be already fine with
your patch, but it will allow the userfaultfd to intercept all
O_DIRECT gup_fast in addition to KVM with your patch.

Eventually get_user_pages should be obsoleted in favor of
get_user_pages_locked (or whoever we decide to call it) so the
userfaultfd can intercept all kind of gups. gup_locked is same as gup
except for one more "locked" parameter at the end, I called the
parameter locked instead of nonblocking because it'd be more proper to
call "nonblocking" gup the FOLL_NOWAIT kind which is quite the
opposite (in fact as the mmap_sem cannot be dropped in the non
blocking version).

ptrace ironically is better off sticking with a NULL locked parameter
and to get a sigbus instead of risking hanging on the userfaultfd
(which would be safe as it can be killed, but it'd be annoying if
erroneously poking into a hole during a gdb session). It's still
possible to pass NULL as parameter to get_user_pages_locked to achieve
that. So the fact some callers won't block in handle_userfault because
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is not set and the userfault cannot block, may
come handy.

What I'm trying to solve in this context is that the userfault cannot
safely block without FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY because we can't allow
userland to take the mmap_sem for an unlimited amount of time without
requiring special privileges, so if handle_userfault wants to blocks
within a gup invocation, it must first release the mmap_sem hence
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is always required at the first attempt for any
virtual address.

With regard to the last sentence, there's actually a race with
MADV_DONTNEED too, I'd need to change the code to always pass
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY (your code also would need to loop and
insisting with the __get_user_pages(locked) version to solve it). The
KVM ioctl worst case would get an -EFAULT if the race materializes for
example. It's non concerning though because that can be solved in
userland somehow by separating ballooning and live migration
activities.

Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ