[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140926163412.4135c44a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:34:12 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the watchdog tree
Hi Guenter,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:12:01 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Someone suggested that I should create an immutable tree with the
> restart handler patchset, which everyone using the restart handlers
> could merge. Is that an option ? I could technically do that,
> but I would want to pick the patches from Andrew's tree to retain
> his sign-off. Andrew, any thoughts/comments ?
That is exactly what you should do.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists