[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54252756.6000001@nexus-software.ie>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:44:06 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, setup: add __flush_tlb() for Intel Quark X1000
On 26/09/14 06:32, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I'd just say:
>
> Quark X1000 wrongly advertises PGE. Work around this with an
> unconditional full flush using a CR3 write instead of CR4.PGE:
Hi Dave.
In another thread with Ingo Molnar and Henrique de Moraes Holschuh the
following text was proposed.
+ /*
+ * Locate the page directory and flush the TLB.
+ *
+ * On Quark X1000 CPUs we still have the PGE bit incorrectly set
+ * due to a processor erratum, so __flush_tlb_all() is not yet
+ * doing what it says. Fortunately we have a cr3 flush here,
+ * which is what is needed in this processor to flush TLBs, so
+ * there's no need to add a Quark X1000 quirk here.
+ *
+ * early_init_intel will unset the X86_FEATURE_PGE flag later
+ * and __flush_tlb_all() will flush via cr3
+ */
Path submitted as "[PATCH] x86: Quark: Comment setup_arch for TLB/PGE
bugfix"
Does that work for you ?
--
BOD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists