[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140926192145.701bde05@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:21:45 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
<llvmlinux@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the llvmlinux tree with the arm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the llvmlinux tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c between commit 95e750c0bac4 ("ARM:
8160/1: drop warning about return_address not using unwind tables")
from the arm tree and commit eeb5c3a69694 ("arm: LLVMLinux: use static
inline in ARM ftrace.h") from the llvmlinux tree (which also exists in
the arm tree).
I fixed it up (I took out the now empty #else clause ... see below) and
can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
index 98ea4b7eb406,b7de88a40176..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
@@@ -57,8 -56,12 +56,6 @@@ void *return_address(unsigned int level
return NULL;
}
--#else /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) */
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
-#warning "TODO: return_address should use unwind tables"
-#endif
--
#endif /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) / else */
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists