lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <849f67c7e1843fbad81a6e0dbbbb1614acbe9c11.1411724723.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:43:59 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 028/142] svcrdma: Select NFSv4.1 backchannel transport based on forward channel

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 3c45ddf823d679a820adddd53b52c6699c9a05ac upstream.

The current code always selects XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP for the back
channel, even when the forward channel was not TCP (eg, RDMA). When
a 4.1 mount is attempted with RDMA, the server panics in the TCP BC
code when trying to send CB_NULL.

Instead, construct the transport protocol number from the forward
channel transport or'd with XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC. Transports that do
not support bi-directional RPC will not have registered a "BC"
transport, causing create_backchannel_client() to fail immediately.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c                   | 3 ++-
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h          | 1 +
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c                     | 2 ++
 net/sunrpc/xprt.c                        | 2 +-
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 1 +
 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
index 3eaa6e30a2dc..cc8c5b32043c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
@@ -672,7 +672,8 @@ static int setup_callback_client(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_cb_conn *c
 		clp->cl_cb_session = ses;
 		args.bc_xprt = conn->cb_xprt;
 		args.prognumber = clp->cl_cb_session->se_cb_prog;
-		args.protocol = XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP;
+		args.protocol = conn->cb_xprt->xpt_class->xcl_ident |
+				XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC;
 		args.authflavor = ses->se_cb_sec.flavor;
 	}
 	/* Create RPC client */
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
index b05963f09ebf..f5bfb1a80abe 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct svc_xprt_class {
 	struct svc_xprt_ops	*xcl_ops;
 	struct list_head	xcl_list;
 	u32			xcl_max_payload;
+	int			xcl_ident;
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 6ac0f1c3fc28..8c6e9c75c525 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -683,6 +683,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_class svc_udp_class = {
 	.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
 	.xcl_ops = &svc_udp_ops,
 	.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_UDP,
+	.xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_UDP,
 };
 
 static void svc_udp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
@@ -1277,6 +1278,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_class svc_tcp_class = {
 	.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
 	.xcl_ops = &svc_tcp_ops,
 	.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
+	.xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP,
 };
 
 void svc_init_xprt_sock(void)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
index 095363eee764..42ce6bfc729d 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt *xprt_create_transport(struct xprt_create *args)
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&xprt_list_lock);
-	printk(KERN_ERR "RPC: transport (%d) not supported\n", args->ident);
+	dprintk("RPC: transport (%d) not supported\n", args->ident);
 	return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
 
 found:
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
index 62e4f9bcc387..ed36cb52cd86 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct svc_xprt_class svc_rdma_class = {
 	.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
 	.xcl_ops = &svc_rdma_ops,
 	.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
+	.xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_RDMA,
 };
 
 struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *svc_rdma_get_context(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt)
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ