lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:12:30 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] perf tool: encapsulate dsos list head into struct
 dsos

Em Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:45:39AM -0400, Waiman Long escreveu:
> This is a precursor patch to enable long name searching of DSOs
> using the rbtree. In this patch, a new dsos structure is created
> which contains only a list head structure for the moment. The new
> dsos structure is used, in turn, in the machine structure for the
> user_dsos and kernel_dsos fields. Only the following 3 dsos functions
> are modified to accept the new dsos structure parameter instead
> of list_head:
>  - dsos__add()
>  - dsos__find()
>  - __dsos__findnew()
> 
> Because of the need to find out the corresponding dsos structure to
> properly call dsos__add() in dso__load_sym() of util/symbol-elf.c,
> a new dsos field is also added to the dso structure.

What tree did you use to produce these patches? I just tried on my
perf/core branch and I get some fuzzes:

[acme@zoo linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch 
patching file tools/perf/util/dso.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 755 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset 2 lines).
patching file tools/perf/util/dso.h
patching file tools/perf/util/header.c
patching file tools/perf/util/machine.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 72 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 477 (offset 29 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 994 (offset 29 lines).
patching file tools/perf/util/machine.h
Hunk #2 succeeded at 39 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line).
patching file tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
patching file tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 929 (offset 13 lines).
[acme@zoo linux]$

I'll fix this up, probably harmless, just a heads up.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ