[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411741357.22717.4.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:22:37 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Weike Chen <alvin.chen@...el.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
Hock Leong Kweh <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>,
Boon Leong Ong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SPI: spi-pxa2xx: SPI support for Intel Quark X1000
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 11:08 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:25:49AM -0700, Weike Chen wrote:
[]
> It might also be helpful for review to have two
> patches, one splitting things out into the functions and another adding
> the Quark support.
I also suggest to go this way.
>
> > +/* see Quark SPI data sheet for implementation rationale */
> > +static u32 quark_x1000_set_clk_regvals(u32 rate, u32 *dds, u32 *clk_div)
> > +{
>
> Please document this in the driver - I don't know if this datasheet is
> public but even if it is it may not stay that way.
Datasheet is public.
I'm just wondering if we can use just a formula instead of table.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists