[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb17fb36d1a04812836ad46bace8c4bf@BY2PR0301MB0613.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 03:14:26 +0000
From: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
To: Shengchao Guo <Shawn.Guo@...escale.com>
CC: "shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] ARM: ls1021a: add gating clocks to IP blocks.
> > > As the parent of the clocks registered by this function is "dummy" from
> > > what I see, what is the point of setting flag CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT then?
> > >
> > > > + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, reg, shift,
> > >
> > > Why flag CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED?
> > >
> >
> > As the SoC reference manual all the IP blocks will be enabled when powered
> up.
> > But the Linux OS will disable all the IP blocks' clocks as default without
> this.
> >
> > For now, this gate driver will only used for PM support of some IP blocks.
> For the
> > Others needed to be enabled as default.
>
> Ok, got it. I'm fine with the flag then, and we can remove it after all
> those client devices manage their clocks well.
>
Okay.
Thanks,
BRs
Xiubo
> Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists