linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] slab: fix cpuset check in fallback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ccdd901946feaf88fd6d2441b18a6845cc56571.1411741632.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:50:54 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] slab: fix cpuset check in fallback_alloc

fallback_alloc is called on kmalloc if the preferred node doesn't have
free or partial slabs and there's no pages on the node's free list
(GFP_THISNODE allocations fail). Before invoking the reclaimer it tries
to locate a free or partial slab on other allowed nodes' lists. While
iterating over the preferred node's zonelist it skips those zones which
hardwall cpuset check returns false for. That means that for a task
bound to a specific node using cpusets fallback_alloc will always ignore
free slabs on other nodes and go directly to the reclaimer, which,
however, may allocate from other nodes if cpuset.mem_hardwall is unset
(default). As a result, we may get lists of free slabs grow without
bounds on other nodes, which is bad, because inactive slabs are only
evicted by cache_reap at a very slow rate and cannot be dropped
forcefully.

To reproduce the issue, run a process that will walk over a directory
tree with lots of files inside a cpuset bound to a node that constantly
experiences memory pressure. Look at num_slabs vs active_slabs growth as
reported by /proc/slabinfo.

To avoid this we should use softwall cpuset check in fallback_alloc.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
---
 mm/slab.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index eb6f0cf6875c..e35822d07821 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3051,7 +3051,7 @@ retry:
 	for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) {
 		nid = zone_to_nid(zone);

-		if (cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, flags | __GFP_HARDWALL) &&
+		if (cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, flags) &&
 			get_node(cache, nid) &&
 			get_node(cache, nid)->free_objects) {
 				obj = ____cache_alloc_node(cache,
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/