[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54257E5D.5060600@mentor.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:55:25 -0500
From: Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: change clocksource
name if CP15 unavailable
Hi Daniel,
On 09/26/2014 02:04 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/18/2014 04:59 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> The arm and arm64 VDSOs need CP15 access to the architected counter.
>> If this is unavailable (which is allowed by ARM v7), indicate this by
>> changing the clocksource name to "arch_mem_counter" before registering
>> the clocksource.
>>
>> Suggested by Stephen Boyd.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> is it possible to have the acked-by of the different maintainers for the
> other patches ?
As Will said, he acked the series.
> Are these patches targeted to be merged for 3.18 ?
3.18 is preferable, if it's not too late. But nothing will break if it
needs to wait.
Thanks,
Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists