[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140926153751.GW5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:37:51 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, tech@...tualopensystems.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
will.deacon@....com, kim.phillips@...escale.com,
eric.auger@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 07/26] driver core: amba: add device binding path
'driver_override'
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:46:06PM +0200, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> As already demonstrated with PCI [1] and the platform bus [2], a
> driver_override property in sysfs can be used to bypass the id matching
> of a device to a AMBA driver. This can be used by VFIO to bind to any AMBA
> device requested by the user.
>
> [1] http://lists-archives.com/linux-kernel/28030441-pci-introduce-new-device-binding-path-using-pci_dev-driver_override.html
> [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-April/msg00382.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
I have to ask why this is even needed in the first place. To take the
example in [2], what's wrong with:
echo fff51000.ethernet > /sys/bus/platform/devices/fff51000.ethernet/driver/unbind
echo fff51000.ethernet > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/vfio-platform/bind
and similar for AMBA.
All we would need to do is to introduce a way of having a driver accept
explicit bind requests.
In any case:
> +static ssize_t driver_override_store(struct device *_dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct amba_device *dev = to_amba_device(_dev);
> + char *driver_override, *old = dev->driver_override, *cp;
> +
> + if (count > PATH_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + driver_override = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!driver_override)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + cp = strchr(driver_override, '\n');
> + if (cp)
> + *cp = '\0';
I hope that is not replicated everywhere. This allows up to a page to be
allocated, even when the first byte may be a newline. This is wasteful.
How about:
if (count > PATH_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
cp = strnchr(buf, count, '\n');
if (cp)
count = cp - buf - 1;
if (count) {
driver_override = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!driver_override)
return -ENOMEM;
} else {
driver_override = NULL;
}
kfree(dev->driver_override);
dev->driver_override = driver_override;
Also:
> +static ssize_t driver_override_show(struct device *_dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct amba_device *dev = to_amba_device(_dev);
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", dev->driver_override);
> +}
Do we really want to do a NULL pointer dereference here?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists