linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1411753981.2739.16.camel@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:53:01 -0400
From:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>, linux@...nrisc.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build

Would you like me to carry this in the audit tree, since I'm the one who
broke it?

-Eric

On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 09:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> openrisc:defconfig fails to build in next-20140926 with the following error.
> 
> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> 
> Fix by moving EM_OPENRISC to include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h.
> 
> Fixes: ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> v2: Only move EM_OPENRISC.
> 
> Another possible solution for the problem would be to include asm/elf.h
> in arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c. I had actually submitted a patch with
> that fix back in August (maybe that is where I remembered the problem from).
> Wonder what happened with that patch.
> 
> Would it make sense to drop EM_OR32 and replace it with EM_OPENRISC where
> it is used ? binutils seems to suggest that EM_OPENRISC is the "official"
> definition.
> 
>  arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
>  include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h          | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> index f02ea58..8884276 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
>  /* A placeholder; OR32 does not have fp support yes, so no fp regs for now.  */
>  typedef unsigned long elf_fpregset_t;
>  
> -/* This should be moved to include/linux/elf.h */
> +/* EM_OPENRISC is defined in linux/elf-em.h */
>  #define EM_OR32         0x8472
> -#define EM_OPENRISC     92     /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
>  
>  /*
>   * These are used to set parameters in the core dumps.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> index 01529bd..aa90bc9 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #define EM_V850		87	/* NEC v850 */
>  #define EM_M32R		88	/* Renesas M32R */
>  #define EM_MN10300	89	/* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
> +#define EM_OPENRISC     92     /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
>  #define EM_BLACKFIN     106     /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
>  #define EM_TI_C6000	140	/* TI C6X DSPs */
>  #define EM_AARCH64	183	/* ARM 64 bit */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/