[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5425BB3E.10700@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:15:10 -0600
From: David Ahern <lxhacker68@...il.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 0/5] netns: allow to identify peer netns
On 9/26/14, 7:40 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>
>>
>> No, I don't want to monitor anything. Even if I wanted, I would just
>> start one
>> daemon in each netns instead of one for all.
> Ok you don't want, but some other people (not only me) want it! And
> having one
> daemon per netns does not scale: there are scenarii with thousand netns
> which
> are dynamically created and deleted.
An example of the scaling problem using quagga (old but still seems to
be a relevant data point):
https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-users/2010-February/011351.html
"2k VRFs that would be 2.6G"
And that does not include the overhead of each namespace -- roughly
200kB/namespace on one kernel I checked (v3.10). So that's a ballpark of
3G of memory.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists