| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 22:04:27 +0200 From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com> To: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>, "Kirsher\, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] include: kernel.h: deduplicate code implementing clamp* macros On Thu, Sep 25 2014, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net> wrote: > On 25 September 2014 17:50, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com> wrote: > >> - * @min: minimum allowable value >> - * @max: maximum allowable value >> + * @lo: minimum allowable value >> + * @hi: maximum allowable value > > Ok, but why do you rename min/max to low/high after so many years? > min/max is just perfect To match argument names of the clamp macro (which got renamed when rewriting min3, max3 and clamp), but I don't really care either way. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists