[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201409262213.31848.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 22:13:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers: of: add return value to of_reserved_mem_device_init
On Thursday 11 September 2014, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> -void of_reserved_mem_device_init(struct device *dev)
> +int of_reserved_mem_device_init(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> struct device_node *np;
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ void of_reserved_mem_device_init(struct device *dev)
>
> rmem->ops->device_init(rmem, dev);
> dev_info(dev, "assigned reserved memory node %s\n", rmem->name);
> + return 0;
> }
This function has two other 'return' statements that now are missing
a return value for the error case and cause undefined behavior
in the caller.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists