linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] x86 : Ensure X86_FLAGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <525DB349B3FB5444AE057A887CB2A8D88F4B57@nice.asicdesigners.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 22:10:30 +0000
From:	Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"sebastian@...-team.de" <sebastian@...-team.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86 : Ensure X86_FLAGS_NT is cleared on syscall entry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Ebbert [mailto:cebbert.lkml@...il.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 3:01 PM
> To: Anish Bhatt
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org; tglx@...utronix.de;
> mingo@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com; sebastian@...-team.de; Linus
> Torvalds
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 : Ensure X86_FLAGS_NT is cleared on syscall entry
> 
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:42:51 -0700
> Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com> wrote:
> 
> > The MSR_SYSCALL_MASK, which is responsible for clearing specific
> > EFLAGS on  syscall entry, should also clear the nested task (NT) flag
> > to be safe from  userspace injection. Without this fix the application
> > segmentation  faults on syscall return because of the changed meaning
> > of the IRET  instruction.
> >
> > Further details can be seen here
> > https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33275
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@...-team.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index e4ab2b4..3126558 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> > @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ void syscall_init(void)
> >  	/* Flags to clear on syscall */
> >  	wrmsrl(MSR_SYSCALL_MASK,
> >  	       X86_EFLAGS_TF|X86_EFLAGS_DF|X86_EFLAGS_IF|
> > -	       X86_EFLAGS_IOPL|X86_EFLAGS_AC);
> > +	       X86_EFLAGS_IOPL|X86_EFLAGS_AC|X86_EFLAGS_NT);
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> 
> I don't get it. Why isn't this patch acceptable, at least on x86-64 where NT is
> never valid?
> 
> Bueller?

Chuck, I don't think anyone has gotten around to reviewing, accepting or 
 rejecting this patch yet.
-Anish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/