[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54260B94.2050502@converseincode.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:57:56 -0700
From: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To: balbi@...com
CC: mturquette@...aro.org, t-kristo@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk, ti, LLVMLinux: Move __init outside of type definition
On 09/26/14 17:55, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:31:48PM -0700, Behan Webster wrote:
>> As written, the __init for ti_clk_get_div_table is in the middle of the return
>> type.
>>
>> The gcc documentation indicates that section attributes should be added to the
>> end of the function declaration:
>>
>> extern void foobar (void) __attribute__ ((section ("bar")));
>>
>> However gcc seems to be very permissive with where attributes can be placed.
>> clang on the other hand isn't so permissive, and fails if you put the section
>> definition in the middle of the return type:
>>
>> drivers/clk/ti/divider.c:298:28: error: expected ';' after struct
>> static struct clk_div_table
>> ^
>> ;
>> drivers/clk/ti/divider.c:298:1: warning: 'static' ignored on this
>> declaration [-Wmissing-declarations]
>> static struct clk_div_table
>> ^
>> drivers/clk/ti/divider.c:299:9: error: type specifier missing,
>> defaults to 'int' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-int]
>> __init *ti_clk_get_div_table(struct device_node *node)
>> ~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/clk/ti/divider.c:345:9: warning: incompatible pointer types
>> returning 'struct clk_div_table *' from a function with result type 'int *' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>> return table;
>> ^~~~~
>> drivers/clk/ti/divider.c:419:9: warning: incompatible pointer types
>> assigning to 'const struct clk_div_table *' from 'int *' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>> *table = ti_clk_get_div_table(node);
>> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 3 warnings and 2 errors generated.
>>
>> By convention, most of the kernel code puts section attributes between the
>> return type and function name. In the case where the return type is a pointer,
>> it's important to place the '*' on left of the __init.
>>
>> This updated code works for both gcc and clang.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>
> makes sense to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Thank you.
> I wonder if we should add this a Sparse or Coccinelle rule.
+1
I'm hoping it can be added to checkpatch as well.
Behan
--
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists