[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <983713E2-1EBC-45CC-8212-20FBFAA9AC0B@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:13:28 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 from flags before passing it into kmalloc.
On 27 Sep 2014, at 16:09, Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@...il.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 4164c5a..273cf6d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_noncoherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> ptr = __dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
> if (!ptr)
> goto no_mem;
> - map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, flags & ~GFP_DMA);
> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order,
> + flags & ~(GFP_DMA | GFP_DMA32));
Do you have an explanation on why this is needed (and such explanation
should also be included in the commit log)? We don’t use ZONE_DMA32 on
arm64 (we did initially but it was for the wrong reasons).
Thanks,
Catalin--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists