linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Don't exchange "short" filenames unconditionally.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:37:36 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Mikhail Efremov <sem@...linux.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Don't exchange "short" filenames unconditionally.

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I suspect that the right approach is to put refcount + rcu_head in
> front of external name and do the following:

That's actually fancier than I was expecting. I was just thinking
doing a whole new allocation and freeing the old one using RCU. But I
guess you're right, you do need the rcu_head even for that, and once
you start adding fields you might as well just add a refcount too, and
then you don't have the annoyance of a potential memory allocation in
that code.

So your approach is better and doesn't sound too painful at all.

But yeah, I guess we can/should do the trivial ugly thing for 3.17.
Send me a proper pull-request,

                  Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/