linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1411906556.11836.26.camel@karhu>
Date:	Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:15:56 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities

On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 11:24 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> This is how I first implemented this patch. But then I cam across
> some 
> ubi_err prints during the init process (in build.c ubi_init()) when
> we 
> still don't have the ubi structure, so we need to pass some number to 
> the message. I overcame this by using UBI_MAX_DEVICES.

Well, may be having two sets of wrappers would make sense then?

Or if there are few of those, just using 'printk()' would be a solution?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/