[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140928160757.GJ1638@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:37:57 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Ténart <antoine@...e-electrons.com>,
lars@...afoo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks
optional
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Nowadays, some drivers don't have anything in there channel allocation
> callbacks anymore.
>
> Remove the BUG_ON if those callbacks aren't implemented, in order to allow
> drivers to not implement them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index d5d30ed863ce..cfcb181b1184 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
> BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> !device->device_prep_interleaved_dma);
>
> - BUG_ON(!device->device_alloc_chan_resources);
> - BUG_ON(!device->device_free_chan_resources);
Dont think we have drivers without free. IIRC cppi one might be only
instance
--
~Vinod
> BUG_ON(!device->device_tx_status);
> BUG_ON(!device->device_issue_pending);
> BUG_ON(!device->dev);
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists