[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5427C5C4.40508@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:24:36 +0300
From: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
CC: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities
On 9/28/2014 11:01 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Tanya,
>
> Am 28.09.2014 08:36, schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
>> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
>> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
>> Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
>
> Artem's mail is dedekind1@ not dedeking1@. :)
oops.... sorry about that. thanks for the fix.
> Anyway, instead of passing ubi->ubi_num down to every log function you can
> just pass the ubi object itself and let the log function access ->ubi_num.
This is how I first implemented this patch. But then I cam across some
ubi_err prints during the init process (in build.c ubi_init()) when we
still don't have the ubi structure, so we need to pass some number to
the message. I overcame this by using UBI_MAX_DEVICES.
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists