[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6706376.rlHA7RUC15@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:48:39 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"chris@...kel.net" <chris@...kel.net>,
"cmetcalf@...era.com" <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"jcmvbkbc@...il.com" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
"jesper.nilsson@...s.com" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"sam@...nborg.org" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"starvik@...s.com" <starvik@...s.com>,
"takata@...ux-m32r.org" <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...aro.org" <broonie@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors
On Monday 29 September 2014 10:25:10 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:36:13PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 26 September 2014 14:46:08 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >
> > > Obviously, this does nothing for the:
> > >
> > > include/asm-generic/io.h:804:29: error: redefinition of 'virt_to_bus'
> > > include/asm-generic/io.h:809:21: error: redefinition of 'bus_to_virt'
> > >
> > > errors which are also reported in Olof's build system.
> > >
> > > Given how close we are to the merge window, I'd suggest this stuff gets
> > > reverted so that it can have a better period of testing, rather than
> > > stuffing it into -next at such a critical time.
> >
> > Right, I've fixed these all up locally, but then found new warnings on
> > allmodconfig builds that I haven't been able to track down yet.
> >
> > I've dropped everything from the asm-generic tree now, so we can get
> > a clean linux-next tree.
>
> Did you actually see any failures due to the relaxed I/O stuff, or was this
> all in the unrelated rework of the asm-generic/io.h file? If the latter, it
> would be a pity to postpone the former series.
>
I believe all the problems I've seen were because of Thierry's series,
I haven't tried separating the two again yet, which is something I'd
probably try today.
However, I saw a lot of different problems with the combined series
and I have a patch to fix them up here, will post that once I see no
new regressions.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists