lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1862760b05184b95948b5e4952db010d@bgmail103.nvidia.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:25:03 +0000
From:	Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Krishna Thota <kthota@...dia.com>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] ARM: tegra: Fix sd4 regulator in Jetson TK1 device
 tree


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@...dotorg.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:36 AM
> To: Vidya Sagar
> Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com; Laxman Dewangan; Krishna Thota; linux-
> tegra@...r.kernel.org; linux@....linux.org.uk; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: tegra: Fix sd4 regulator in Jetson TK1 device
> tree
> 
> On 09/22/2014 11:57 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> > sd4 is an always on regulator which is turned on at boot time.
> > It is externally controller through gpio. This change reflects the
> > same in Jetson TK1 device tree
> 
> In the schematics, the "Power Sequencing" timing diagram says "S/W
> controlled" for SD4/+1.05V_RUN. I also don't see an "ENABLE1" pin on the
> AS3722, which would be required for ...
> 
> > +					ams,ext-control = <1>;
> 
> ... to be valid.
> 
> What's the source of information behind this change?
> 
> What symptoms does this patch correct?

I'm seeing one issue when I add support for PCIe suspend/resume functionality.
The issue is that, when regulator_bulk_diable() is called, disabling one of the power rails (which is deriving its voltage from SD4) of PCIe is failing.
The reason being, I2C controller is getting power gated before power rail disable is called.
Hence SD4 is made dependent on ENABLE1, which is nothing but the deep sleep signal coming from Tegra,
So eventually, SD4 will be powered off when system enters into deep-sleep state.
Source of information is from downstream kernel 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ