linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54294543.2030003@hitachi.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:40:51 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test
 cases

(2014/09/26 23:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
> 
> 2014-09-26 (금), 20:54 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu:
>> (2014/09/26 15:06), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:08:53 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:01:38 -0600
>>>> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am working on adding the framework for c tests. We will have
>>>>> to get this evolved for shell scripts. Please see the following
>>>>> thread:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/23/926
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Also, what's the rules for a test that requires other tools. Some of my
>>>> tests require trace-cmd to be installed as well as perf. My stress test
>>>> runs perf against trace-cmd running hackbench (another required tool),
>>>> but I believe that perf has hackbench built in so I could replace
>>>> hackbench with the perf version.
>>>
>>> Yeah, and I think we can at least build perf (if not found) for test as
>>> we can always have the source.  The trace-cmd is different and it'd be
>>> another reason I need to work on 'perf ftrace' command soon.  ;-)
>>
>> +1 :)
>>
>> For the kselftest, we can only expect to have tools in kernel tree (which
>> should be static-linked) and busybox, so that we can use qemu emulator to
>> run kselftest on other archs. I guess perf still need some shared
>> objects to run. That should be solved too.
> 
> The perf should be built with no extra dependencies (other than libc).
> It won't provide rich features but basic functionality (record, report,
> stat) should be supported.  And I'm also thinking about implementing a
> very simple elf parser for symbol loading in such a minimal build.

Maybe you can install some static libraries (e.g. elfutils-libelf-devel-static
on fedora) for enabling it. :)
Some libraries may not work, but I could enable libelf by installing that.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/