linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] thermal: Add Tegra SOCTHERM thermal management driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542960B2.1010200@kapsi.fi>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:37:54 +0300
From:	Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>, edubezval@...il.com,
	swarren@...dotorg.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, juha-matti.tilli@....fi,
	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] thermal: Add Tegra SOCTHERM thermal management
 driver

On 09/29/2014 11:29 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:28:31PM +0300, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>> On 09/26/2014 02:45 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> [...]
>>> I think a more idiomatic way to write this would be:
>>>
>>> static int
>>> calculate_tsensor_calibration(const struct tegra_tsensor *sensor,
>>> 			      struct tsensor_shared_calibration shared,
>>> 			      u32 *calib)
>>
>> If I do that, it will go over the 80 character limit by quite a few
>> characters, which is why I didn't use that style. Personally I'm fine with
>> either style.
>
> The above doesn't exceed the 80 character limit. Putting the return
> value and the static keyword on a separate line is a pretty common way
> to reduce line length.

Good point, I didn't think of doing that. I usually never use the above 
style, but clearly here it is the best choice.

>
>>>
>>> While at it, perhaps make shared a const * instead of passing it in by
>>> value?
>>
>> That is possible, but I'm not sure what the difference would be. Is there a
>> style rule forbidding by-value compound types? (Also if I change the style,
>> it would go over 80 characters by even more.)
>
> No it doesn't. The below fits within 80 characters per line just fine:
>
> static int
> calculate_tsensor_calibration(const struct tegra_tsensor *sensor,
> 			      const struct tsensor_shared_calibration *shared,
> 			      u32 *calib)
>
> Thierry
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/