[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54296856.2020104@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:10:30 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Robert Elliott <elliott@...com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/38] libata: use __scsi_print_command()
On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using
>> __scsi_print_command() here.
>>
>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>> Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>
> Applied to libata/for-3.18.
>
> Thanks.
>
Errm.
Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be
applied previously.
I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it
routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be
applied if the previous patches are in.
Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists