linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] enhance DMA CMA on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC5umyjP4OscSC8igVLYPEm-6gqiXt9md46sLu77Vut5UiPb=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:32:55 +0900
From:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	x86@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] enhance DMA CMA on x86

2014-09-29 21:09 GMT+09:00 Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>:
> On 09/27/2014 08:31 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> 2014-09-27 23:30 GMT+09:00 Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>:
>>> On 04/15/2014 09:08 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>>> This patch set enhances the DMA Contiguous Memory Allocator on x86.
>
> [...]
>
>>> What this patchset does is restrict all iommu configurations which can
>>> map all of system memory to one _very_ small physical region, thus disabling
>>> the whole point of an iommu.
>>>
>>> Now I know why my GPU is causing paging to disk! And why my RAID controller
>>> stalls for ages when I do a git log at the same time as a kernel build!
>>
>> The solution I have for this is that instead of trying to
>> dma_alloc_from_contiguous() firstly, call alloc_pages() in dma_alloc_coherent().
>> dma_alloc_from_contiguous() should be called only when alloc_pages() is failed
>> or DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS is specified in dma_attr.
>
> Why is all this extra complexity being added when there are no X86 users
> of DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS?

I misunderstood DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS.  It is specified to request
that underlaying DMA mapping span physically contiguous with IOMMU.
But current alloc_dma_coherent() for intel-iommu always returns
physically contiguous memory, so it is ignored on x86.

>>> And the apparent goal of this patchset is to enable DMA allocation below
>>> 4GB, which is already supported in the existing page allocator with the
>>> GFP_DMA32 flag?!
>>
>> The goal of this patchset is to enable huge DMA allocation which
>> alloc_pages() can't (> MAX_ORDER) for the devices that require it.
>
> What x86 devices need > MAX_ORDER DMA allocation and why can't they allocate
> directly from dma_alloc_from_contiguous()?

I need this for UFS unified memory extension which is apparently not in
mainline for now.
http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jesd220-1
http://www.jedec.org/sites/default/files/T_Fujisawa_MF_2013.pdf

But there must be some other use cases on x86, too.  Because I have
received several emails privately from developers who care its status.

And allocating directly from dma_alloc_from_contiguous() in the driver
doesn't work with IOMMU, as it just returns memory regoin and doesn't
create DMA mapping.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/