[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54297448.8080501@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:01:28 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()
Hi Kirill,
On 27/09/14 09:40, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
>
> hrtimer_try_to_cancel() may bring a suprise, and even two its calls
> may fail.
>
> So, let's implement 100% guaranteed way to cancel the timer and let's
> be sure we are safe even in very unlikely situations.
>
Could you give more details about the unlikely situations in the
changelog? It would be nice to have some more information for future
reference.
Thanks,
- Juri
> We do not create any problem with rq unlocking, because it already
> may happed below in pull_dl_task(). No problem with deadline tasks
> balancing too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index abfaf3d..63f8b4a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -555,11 +555,6 @@ void init_dl_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> {
> struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->dl_timer;
>
> - if (hrtimer_active(timer)) {
> - hrtimer_try_to_cancel(timer);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> hrtimer_init(timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> timer->function = dl_task_timer;
> }
> @@ -1567,10 +1562,34 @@ void init_sched_dl_class(void)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> +/*
> + * Surely cancel task's dl_timer. May drop rq->lock.
> + */
> +static void cancel_dl_timer(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct hrtimer *dl_timer = &p->dl.dl_timer;
> +
> + /* Nobody will change task's class if pi_lock is held */
> + lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
> +
> + if (hrtimer_active(dl_timer)) {
> + int ret = hrtimer_try_to_cancel(dl_timer);
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret == -1)) {
> + /*
> + * Note, p may migrate OR new deadline tasks
> + * may appear in rq when we are unlocking it.
> + */
> + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> + hrtimer_cancel(dl_timer);
> + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.dl_timer) && !dl_policy(p->policy))
> - hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
> + cancel_dl_timer(rq, p);
>
> __dl_clear_params(p);
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists