[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5428E0ED.1050107@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:32:45 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/xen-scsiback: Need go to fail after xenbus_dev_error()
On 09/26/2014 06:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> When failure occurs, after xenbus_dev_error(), need go to fail to let
> upper caller know about it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> index 847bc9c..3e430e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> @@ -1222,8 +1222,10 @@ static int scsiback_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>
> err = xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, "feature-sg-grant", "%u",
> SG_ALL);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> xenbus_dev_error(dev, err, "writing feature-sg-grant");
> + goto fail;
> + }
>
> xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateInitWait);
> return 0;
>
Hmm, not testing for failure was on purpose. Advertising this feature
is just for tuning purposes, not mandatory.
OTOH it would really be a strange error if this xenbus_printf() fails
but all other operations are working, and signaling an error at the
time when it first shows up is a good thing. So:
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists