linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1412005610.4302.26.camel@joe-AO725>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:46:50 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with
 seq_puts()

On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 11:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Anyway, that should be a second patch, and we should get my current
> patch (the one to make putc and puts the same) in first, as that
> actually fixes the inconsistency between the two.
> 
> I'll post another patch to try to make seq_file operations a bit more
> consistent. Perhaps we can have m->count be what would have been
> written.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/11/801


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/