linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:08:01 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with
 seq_puts()

On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 16:47 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:41:22PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Hmm, this inconsistency seems to be in more functions. I would divide
> > it into three categories:
[]
> No.  _Any_ caller that decides to report that error to its caller is fucking
> broken.  We had some cases like that.
[]
> And let's make seq_printf and friends return void.  Any breakage we miss
> on grep will be caught by compiler.  Enough is enough.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/11/8


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/