linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:42:46 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file: Fix seq_putc() to be consistent with
 seq_puts()

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:30:35 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:


> > Since you like posting links:
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/11/76
> > 
> > If you want to resurrect your patches, go ahead. I'll pull them into my
> > list. Probably should rename seq_overflow() to seq_is_full(), which
> > makes it sound less of an error.
> > 
> > And as Al noted, only fix what's there (just the places that check the
> > return values). Don't add anything else.
> 
> I did that too
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/11/713
> 
> Then I gave up.

Although I like seq_is_full() over seq_is_buf_full(), I'll take either.
If Al would ack those patches I'd be happy to take them in.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/