[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1412014009-13315-6-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:06:41 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tony@...mide.com,
balbi@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
vinod.koul@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 05/13] tty: serial: 8250_dma: keep own book keeping about RX transfers
After dmaengine_terminate_all() has been invoked then both DMA drivers
(edma and omap-dma) do not invoke dma_cookie_complete() to mark the
transfer as complete. This dma_cookie_complete() is performed by the
Synopsys DesignWare driver which is probably the only one that is used
by omap8250-dma and hence don't see following problem…
…which is that once a RX transfer has been terminated then following
query of channel status reports DMA_IN_PROGRESS (again: the actual
transfer has been canceled, there is nothing going on anymore).
This means that serial8250_rx_dma() never enqueues another DMA transfer
because it (wrongly) assumes that there is a transer already pending.
Vinod Koul refuses to accept a patch which adds this
dma_cookie_complete() to both drivers and so dmaengine_tx_status() would
report DMA_COMPLETE instead (and behave like the Synopsys DesignWare
driver already does). He argues that I am not allowed to use the cookie
to query the status and that the driver already cleaned everything up after
the invokation of dmaengine_terminate_all().
To end this I add a bookkeeping whether or not a RX-transfer has been
started to the 8250-dma code. It has already been done for the TX side.
*Now* we learn about the RX status based on our bookkeeping and don't
need dmaengine_tx_status() for this anymore.
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h | 1 +
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dma.c | 10 ++++------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
index a63d198f8d03..ebab625179d4 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct uart_8250_dma {
unsigned char tx_running:1;
unsigned char tx_err: 1;
+ unsigned char rx_running:1;
};
struct old_serial_port {
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dma.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dma.c
index 69e54abb6e71..db9eda3c12d6 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dma.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static void __dma_rx_complete(void *param)
dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dma->rxchan->device->dev, dma->rx_addr,
dma->rx_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ dma->rx_running = 0;
dmaengine_tx_status(dma->rxchan, dma->rx_cookie, &state);
dmaengine_terminate_all(dma->rxchan);
@@ -123,10 +124,6 @@ int serial8250_rx_dma(struct uart_8250_port *p, unsigned int iir)
{
struct uart_8250_dma *dma = p->dma;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
- struct dma_tx_state state;
- int dma_status;
-
- dma_status = dmaengine_tx_status(dma->rxchan, dma->rx_cookie, &state);
switch (iir & 0x3f) {
case UART_IIR_RLSI:
@@ -137,7 +134,7 @@ int serial8250_rx_dma(struct uart_8250_port *p, unsigned int iir)
* If RCVR FIFO trigger level was not reached, complete the
* transfer and let 8250_core copy the remaining data.
*/
- if (dma_status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS) {
+ if (dma->rx_running) {
dmaengine_pause(dma->rxchan);
__dma_rx_complete(p);
}
@@ -146,7 +143,7 @@ int serial8250_rx_dma(struct uart_8250_port *p, unsigned int iir)
break;
}
- if (dma_status)
+ if (dma->rx_running)
return 0;
desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dma->rxchan, dma->rx_addr,
@@ -155,6 +152,7 @@ int serial8250_rx_dma(struct uart_8250_port *p, unsigned int iir)
if (!desc)
return -EBUSY;
+ dma->rx_running = 1;
desc->callback = __dma_rx_complete;
desc->callback_param = p;
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists