[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140929185140.GA14343@console-pimps.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:51:40 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Add Intel Cache QoS Monitoring
support
On Wed, 24 Sep, at 10:39:37PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:27:39PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > > > +static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i, cpu, ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC))
> > > > + return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > This should use cpufeature.h
> >
> > What? Please be more explicit.
>
> Using x86_match_cpu and friends, then it would work for module
> auto loading too.
OK, I'll take a look at that, thanks.
> > > But in fact what good is the test then if you only
> > > every likely check cpu #0?
> >
> > We don't, we check every online cpu, not just cpu 0.
>
> There are no other cpus online at this point?
There are definitely other cpus online at this point, smp_init() gets
called before do_initcalls().
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists