[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140929194512.GA7038@mew.dhcp4.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:45:12 -0700
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix sparse address space warnings
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:07:38PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 01:48:11AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > The buffer passed to vfs_write in send and several casts of ioctl fields are
> > missing the __user annotation. Also fixes a couple of related trivial style
> > issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Thank you.
> > @@ -639,8 +640,7 @@ static int send_header(struct send_ctx *sctx)
> > - return write_buf(sctx->send_filp, &hdr, sizeof(hdr),
> > - &sctx->send_off);
> > + return write_buf(sctx->send_filp, &hdr, sizeof(hdr), &sctx->send_off);
>
> > ret = write_buf(sctx->send_filp, sctx->send_buf, sctx->send_size,
> > - &sctx->send_off);
> > + &sctx->send_off);
>
> Please do not fold unrelated changes.
My metric for "related" here was that these were call sites of a function I
directly modified. Is the preferred form to just split style fixes that we
encounter into a separate patch in the series?
--
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists