[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1412029912.4285.110.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:31:52 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 10/12] PCI: Assign unassigned bus resources in
pci_scan_root_bus()
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 15:33 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Right and on powerpc and others as well. We need to survey existing
> > resources. We also have a number of platform things that might need
> > to happen before we do the final re-assignment pass.
>
> That's true today. But I don't know whether it *has* to be this way
> forever. On x86, pcibios_resource_survey() throws in E820 information
> (which we know long before we do any PCI enumeration) and some IO-APIC
> resources (it looks like we also know these before PCI enumeration).
> Powerpc has pcibios_reserve_legacy_regions(), but that looks like
> mostly stuff that could be done when we find the host bridge, before
> we enumerate PCI devices below it.
Oh we can probably change that but it's going to be much more work than
just moving the assignment into pci_scan_root_bus(). There are also a
number of subtle and not-so-subtle bits of code that rely on side
effects of the current code such as anything that tests for bus->added
or dev->added. Again, nothing we can't sort out eventually but the
transition might be a bit painful.
We might need to introduce a new flag for platforms converted to the
"new style" generalized resource assignment which we can deprecate once
everybody has moved over.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists