linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] seq_file: Rename static bool seq_overflow to public bool seq_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:48:15 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] seq_file: Rename static bool seq_overflow to public
 bool seq_is_full

On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 19:44 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:08:21 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > The return values of seq_printf/puts/putc are frequently misused.
> > 
> > Start down a path to remove all the return value uses of these
> > functions.
[]
> Actually, can you make a separate function that's public that is
> seq_is_full(), where m->count >= m->size, and leave seq_overflow()
> alone.

Change the first patch to suit your taste.

The rest of the series should not need change.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/