linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] amd64_edac: enforce synchronous probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140930072328.GD14081@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:23:28 +0200
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	tiwai@...e.de, arjan@...ux.intel.com, teg@...m.no,
	rmilasan@...e.com, werner@...e.com, oleg@...hat.com, hare@...e.com,
	bpoirier@...e.de, santosh@...lsio.com, pmladek@...e.cz,
	dbueso@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] amd64_edac: enforce synchronous probe

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:41:23AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:57:15PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> ...
> > [   14.414746]  [<ffffffff814d2cf9>] ? dump_stack+0x41/0x51
> > [   14.414790]  [<ffffffff81061972>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0x90
> > [   14.414834]  [<ffffffff810619d7>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
> > [   14.414880]  [<ffffffff814d0ac3>] ? printk+0x4f/0x51
> > [   14.414921]  [<ffffffff811f8593>] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x83/0x90
> > [   14.415000]  [<ffffffff8137433d>] ? driver_sysfs_remove+0x1d/0x40
> > [   14.415046]  [<ffffffff81374a15>] ? driver_probe_device+0x1d5/0x250
> > [   14.415099]  [<ffffffff81374b4b>] ? __driver_attach+0x7b/0x80
> > [   14.415149]  [<ffffffff81374ad0>] ? __device_attach+0x40/0x40
> > [   14.415204]  [<ffffffff81372a13>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x53/0x90
> > [   14.415254]  [<ffffffff81373913>] ? driver_attach_workfn+0x13/0x80
> > [   14.415298]  [<ffffffff81077403>] ? process_one_work+0x143/0x3c0
> > [   14.415342]  [<ffffffff81077a44>] ? worker_thread+0x114/0x480
> > [   14.415384]  [<ffffffff81077930>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2b0/0x2b0
> > [   14.415427]  [<ffffffff8107c261>] ? kthread+0xc1/0xe0
> > [   14.415468]  [<ffffffff8107c1a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
> > [   14.415511]  [<ffffffff814d883c>] ? ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> > [   14.415554]  [<ffffffff8107c1a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
> 
> Do you have CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER turned off?

Yeah..

> Probe failure itself
> aside, the above looks like a bug in really_probe()'s error path.  It
> looks like it can try to remove sysfs directory that it hasn't added
> yet.

I see one area where that can happen, will debug a bit more to see if we
are running into that here with async probe.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/