[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542A608B.5010408@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:49:31 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
CC: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: DT: apq8064: add rpm support
On 30/09/14 06:11, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>
>> + apcs: syscon@...1000 {
>> + compatible = "syscon";
>> + reg = <0x2011000 0x1000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + rpm@...000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-apq8064";
>> + reg = <0x108000 0x1000>;
>> + qcom,ipc = <&apcs 0x8 2>;
>
> I don't like your indentation, but please stick with one way of doing it :)
>
I agree, Will fix this in next version.
>> +
>> + interrupts = <0 19 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
>> + interrupt-names = "ack", "err", "wakeup";
>> +
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>
> This part looks good.
>
> But how about adding all the regulators here as well?
Yes we can add for the sake of completeness but w.r.t testing only some
of them will be tested
> Like:
>
> pm8921_l5: pm8921-l5 {
> compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8921-pldo";
> reg = <QCOM_RPM_PM8921_LDO5>;
> };
>
Adding nodes like this should be trival.
> ...
>
> That way we can update the references from this file (while still allowing the
> dts to override it if needed). I'm not sure if we should add some sane defaults
> or just completely deferr specifying the voltage ranges to the dts. The benefit
> of the latter is that the regulators not configured by the dts author will not
> be accessible.
>
> But simply listing all the nodes here would be nice and I dont see much reason
> to postpone this work.
Ok.. will be done in next version.
--srini
>
>> + };
>> +
>> /* Temporary fixed regulator */
>> vsdcc_fixed: vsdcc-regulator {
>> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists