[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542A6D96.7090207@nexus-software.ie>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:45:10 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hmh@....eng.br, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Bugfix bit-rot in the calling of legacy_cache_size
On 30/09/14 04:41, Dave Jones wrote:
> Shouldn't this patch be more like..
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
> -#else
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>
> ?
Hmm, maybe but you have code in cpu_detect_cache_sizes that's X86_64 only..
void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
unsigned int n, dummy, ebx, ecx, edx, l2size;
n = c->extended_cpuid_level;
if (n >= 0x80000005) {
cpuid(0x80000005, &dummy, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
c->x86_cache_size = (ecx>>24) + (edx>>24);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/* On K8 L1 TLB is inclusive, so don't count it */
c->x86_tlbsize = 0;
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists