linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tun: make sure interface usage can not overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1412078639.7155.30.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:59 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Masatake YAMATO <yamato@...hat.com>, Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>,
	stephen hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: make sure interface usage can not overflow

On Di, 2014-09-30 at 11:18 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic 
> > On Di, 2014-09-30 at 08:20 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Hannes Frederic
> > > > On Mo, 2014-09-29 at 12:41 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:04 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> > > > > > From: Kees Cook
> > > > > >> This makes the size argument a const, since it is always populated by
> > > > > >> the caller.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is almost no point making parameters 'const.
> > > > > > ('const foo *' makes sense).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Additionally double-checks to make sure the copy_from_user
> > > > > >> can never overflow, keeping CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS happy:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>    In function 'copy_from_user',
> > > > > >>        inlined from '__tun_chr_ioctl' at drivers/net/tun.c:1871:7:
> > > > > >>        ... copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If 'ifreq_len' could be too big then you want to error the ioctl, not panic.
> > > > > > If it can't be too big you don't need the check.
> > > > >
> > > > > The ifreq_len comes from the callers, and is the output of "sizeof"
> > > > > which is const. Changing the function parameter to "const" means any
> > > > > changes made in the future where the incoming value isn't const, the
> > > > > compiler will throw a warning.
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, I think you want something like BUILD_BUG_ON(!
> > > > __builtin_constant_p(var)). const in function argument only ensures that
> > > > the value cannot be modified in the function.
> > >
> > > You'd have to do something in the header file - nothing in the function
> > > body can do that check.
> > 
> > Sure, it should work. You only need to make sure that gcc inlines the
> > function, so the value is constant (it is not enough that gcc knows the
> > value range, one specific constant is needed). So the simplest fix for
> > this is to specify __tun_chr_ioctl as __always_inline. ;)
> 
> You are joking aren't you???

It would propagate the value from the compat and non-compat helper
functions to __tun_chr_ioctl and the __builtin_constant_p checks would
be true in the inlined copy_from/to_user, so no, I was not joking, but
because of my smiley I didn't considered this fix seriously.

> Look at the code.

I did.

> I'd suggest fixing whatever implements CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
> to be less picky.

This might involve gcc changes. E.g. on my gcc I don't get any errors.
But by looking at the code it might be plausible wrong estimations are
being made.

But somehow I really cannot follow the original bug report. Looks like
Kees' __builtin_object_size is broken?

I also checked my tun.i file, I really use gcc __builtin_object_size.

Strange...

Bye,
Hannes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/