lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542AA96A.4070303@st.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:00:26 +0200
From:	Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To:	<hliang1025@...il.com>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<adi-linux-docs@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet : stmicro: fixed power suspend and resume
 failure in stmmac driver

Hello Hao Liang

On 9/30/2014 7:55 AM, hliang1025@...il.com wrote:
> From: Hao Liang <hliang1025@...il.com>
>
> This is the fix for a power management issue caused by suspend and resume function in stmmac_main.c.
> After enable CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP which enable sleep-inside atomic section checking, power
> managemet can not work normally. Board couldn't wakeup successfully after suspend. Command
> "echo mem > /sys/power/state" suspend the board.
>
> In suspend and resume function of stmmac driver, there are some sleep-inside function in atomic section
> created by spin lock. These functions will causes system warnings and wakeup issue when enable
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
>
> This bug was fixed by:
> * replace some sleep function with non-sleep function
>    clk_disable_unprepare -> clk_disable ...
> * decrease the atomic area created by spin lock function. The original atomic area in resume function is
> too large.

I had done something in this patch:
    [PATCH (net.git)] stmmac: fix and review whole driver locking

Indeed I was not able to review it after some advice but I will do it!

So we can review your patch and then I will re-base my work on top of
yours.

I just wonder if the spinlock can be safely removed instead of
surrounding just the code to clear the descriptors that should
not be claimed by others. Maybe the only part shared is the
stmmac_hw_setup that can be invoked by open method.

peppe

> Signed-off-by: Hao Liang <hliang1025@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c |   13 +++++++------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 6e6ee22..2effbfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -2924,9 +2924,8 @@ int stmmac_suspend(struct net_device *ndev)
>   	if (priv->phydev)
>   		phy_stop(priv->phydev);
>
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> -
>   	netif_device_detach(ndev);
> +
>   	netif_stop_queue(ndev);
>
>   	napi_disable(&priv->napi);
> @@ -2935,6 +2934,8 @@ int stmmac_suspend(struct net_device *ndev)
>   	priv->hw->dma->stop_tx(priv->ioaddr);
>   	priv->hw->dma->stop_rx(priv->ioaddr);
>
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +
>   	stmmac_clear_descriptors(priv);
>
>   	/* Enable Power down mode by programming the PMT regs */
> @@ -2945,7 +2946,7 @@ int stmmac_suspend(struct net_device *ndev)
>   		stmmac_set_mac(priv->ioaddr, false);
>   		pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(priv->device);
>   		/* Disable clock in case of PWM is off */
> -		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->stmmac_clk);
> +		clk_disable(priv->stmmac_clk);
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> @@ -2977,12 +2978,14 @@ int stmmac_resume(struct net_device *ndev)
>   	} else {
>   		pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(priv->device);
>   		/* enable the clk prevously disabled */
> -		clk_prepare_enable(priv->stmmac_clk);
> +		clk_enable(priv->stmmac_clk);
>   		/* reset the phy so that it's ready */
>   		if (priv->mii)
>   			stmmac_mdio_reset(priv->mii);
>   	}
>
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +
>   	netif_device_attach(ndev);
>
>   	stmmac_hw_setup(ndev);
> @@ -2991,8 +2994,6 @@ int stmmac_resume(struct net_device *ndev)
>
>   	netif_start_queue(ndev);
>
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> -
>   	if (priv->phydev)
>   		phy_start(priv->phydev);
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ